From Noise to Signal: A New Architecture for Organisational Transformation

Transformation has become the defining challenge, and opportunity, for organisations in this decade. Whether it’s culture, operating model, technology, or post-merger integration, the imperative is no longer simply to define change, but to achieve it at scale. Yet, too often, even with strong leadership, resources, and intent, transformation plateaus, progress stalls, and strategic goals remain aspirations rather than lived realities.

This isn’t because the ideas are flawed or the people lack capability. It’s because most organisations are still trying to drive transformation using tools designed for structure, not human systems. The difference between transformation that sticks and one that slips away is rarely visible on an org chart. It lives in trust, engagement, influence, and the unwritten ways work gets done.

We are now entering a new era, one where these invisible systems can not only be seen, but shaped. This is precisely why we announced our recent partnership with Swarm, a collaboration that marks a turning point in how organisations can use behavioural analytics to unlock the human architecture beneath their formal structures. On the heels of that announcement, this article aims to frame what comes next and why it matters.

The Architecture Beneath the Architecture

Every transformation effort begins with structure: operating models, governance, milestones, OKRs. These are essential, but incomplete. What determines whether transformation takes root is not just whether you’ve built the right architecture, but whether the organisation’s informal system, the architecture beneath the architecture, supports or resists it. This hidden system includes:

• The informal networks where people go for truth

• The unspoken norms around risk, initiative, and feedback

• The micro-leaders who influence far beyond their job titles

These dynamics have historically been anecdotal. Leadership teams may have intuitions about who the “go-to” people are or where energy is lagging, but they’ve lacked evidence. Now, we can measure these behaviours. Not through invasive surveillance or unreliable surveys, but through behavioural analytics that observe how teams collaborate, communicate, and build trust across time and space. This moves us from guesswork to clarity.

The Architecture Beneath the Architecture.

Why Only 9% of Transformation Agents Are the Right Ones

One of the most telling data points we’ve uncovered in our work is that when organisations select individuals to lead or champion transformation, they get it right 9% of the time, at best. More often than not, it is 0.

That means in almost all instances, the people we’ve tasked with catalysing change aren’t the ones best positioned to do so. Not because they’re incapable, but because they are not key players in the informal systems where change actually happens. This can be driven from many fronts. Perhaps they lack the trust, relational reach, or the behavioural consistency that earns followership.  This is the consequence of managing transformation from the top down, rather than from the inside out.

What if we could see who truly shapes behaviour? What if we could amplify those individuals, not to control others, but to enable a tipping point?

From Tipping Point to Strategy: Gladwell and Lencioni, Reframed

Malcolm Gladwell’s Tipping Point taught us that large-scale change does not happen incrementally. It happens when a system reaches a moment of critical momentum, where influence, adoption, and belief align just enough to spark acceleration.  In organisations, this tipping point doesn’t emerge by accident. It is architected through focus, not on everyone, but on the right few who move the many. And this is where Patrick Lencioni’s Law of Thirds complements this perfectly. In any transformation, a third of people are early believers. A third are skeptical. And a third, the middle, are undecided.  This middle third is where momentum is made or lost, depending on which third is activated in a transformation and manages to influence them. They aren’t resisting. They’re waiting. Watching. Deciding.

And here is the breakthrough: we can now identify the thirds. We can visualise where belief is forming, where neutrality lives, and how to engage it. We can observe whether efforts are pushing the system closer to its tipping point, or away, and adapt your strategies in near real time.

For transformation leaders, this means strategy is no longer just about alignment. It’s about activation.

What This Makes Possible

When we understand the informal system, who is influencing whom, how norms are spreading, where behavioural energy is building, we unlock a new type of leadership. One that:

• Selects change agents based on traction, not titles

• Focuses effort where belief is mobile, not fixed

• Aligns formal roles with informal dynamics

• Sees resistance as a signal, not a setback

This is how organisations move from driving change at people to building change with them.  Whether you’re integrating teams post-acquisition, redefining culture, or launching a new enterprise direction, this capability repositions transformation from a push to a networked movement.

From Clarity to Confidence

At CMBYND, we believe the future of transformation lies in precision, navigating trust, traction, and belief. We’re helping organisations build this capability into how they lead, how they listen, and how they scale momentum. The goal isn’t just to implement, it is to reach the tipping point, and sustain it.

In an era where change fatigue is real and transformation stakes are high, knowing where to focus is the unlock.

For those who see it clearly, it’s a strategic advantage.

For more practical insights on financial services transformation, follow CMBYND on LinkedIn and subscribe to our newsletter CMBYND Thinking.