Navigating the Complexities of Third-Party Risk Management

In today’s financial ecosystem, reliance on third parties is not just commonplace, it’s a strategic necessity. From cloud providers to fintech partners, vendors enable operational efficiency, innovation, and customer reach. Yet with this reliance comes an expanding risk surface that boards, regulators, and customers can no longer afford to overlook.

Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) is no longer just a procurement or IT function. It has matured into a cross-functional discipline that blends governance, compliance, cybersecurity, and operational resilience. The challenge? Most organisations are still playing catch-up.

A common issue we observe is the fragmentation of oversight. Different business units manage their vendors in silos, leading to inconsistent risk scoring, redundant assessments, and blind spots in performance monitoring. This decentralisation hinders the organisation’s ability to detect concentration risk, respond to disruptions, or demonstrate effective oversight to regulators.

Additionally, the regulatory landscape is shifting rapidly. Canadian regulators, in alignment with other jurisdictions, are pressing for real-time visibility into vendor controls, clear delineation of roles and responsibilities, and robust incident response protocols. The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions’ (OSFI) operational resilience guidance (E-21) has only heightened these expectations, reinforcing the need for continuous risk monitoring, not just annual due diligence.

Technology promises a way forward, but it’s not a panacea. Many firms have adopted vendor risk platforms only to find they lack the process maturity and governance discipline to use them effectively. Automation without clarity of ownership, risk appetite, thresholds, and escalation paths often leads to false assurance.

There is also an emerging risk in the “nth party” or fourth- and fifth-tier suppliers that may be invisible to the contracting organisation but capable of causing significant disruption. Recent incidents across industries have underscored the point: an organisation’s resilience is directly tied to the resilience of its third parties.

Your resilience is only as strong as the links that connect you.

At its core, TPRM is about building resilience without sacrificing agility. It requires a balanced framework that aligns with business strategy, regulatory expectations, and evolving threat landscapes. Hard questions need to be asked: Do we understand how our critical vendors would respond in a cyber event? What happens if a key provider becomes insolvent? Are our onboarding and offboarding processes as rigorous as they should be?

These are not hypothetical questions, they are central to long-term viability and critical vendor visibility.

Organisations that take the time to step back and design TPRM programs thoughtfully are better positioned to move from reactive compliance to proactive risk intelligence. With the right structures in place, oversight becomes part of day-to-day decision-making rather than an afterthought.

The result? Stronger governance, greater confidence, and the ability to seize opportunities without being held back by uncertainty.

For more practical insights on financial services transformation, follow CMBYND on LinkedIn and subscribe to our newsletter CMBYND Thinking.